We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks. GTX 1650 SUPER 2019 4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt 26.34 +6% GTX 1060 3 GB 2016 3 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt 24.85 GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RX 580 Arc A580 RX 5700 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms GTX 1060 3 GB by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results. GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1060 3 GB GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. no data General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1650 SUPER26.34 +6% GTX 1060 3 GB24.85 This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. GTX 1650 SUPER10162 +6% GTX 1060 3 GB9588 Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +9.2% −9.2% +23.3% −23.3% +22.2% −22.2% Full HD +14.5% −14.5% Full HD +14% −14% +6% −6% +7.5% −7.5% +8% −8% +11.1% −11.1% +9.1% −9.1% +13.3% −13.3% +7.9% −7.9% +12.7% −12.7% +9.1% −9.1% +6.2% −6.2% +12% −12% +12.5% −12.5% +12.5% −12.5% Full HD +14% −14% +8.3% −8.3% +7.5% −7.5% +8% −8% +14.3% −14.3% +9.1% −9.1% +13.3% −13.3% +7.9% −7.9% +7.3% −7.3% +9.1% −9.1% +9.3% −9.3% +13.3% −13.3% +6.3% −6.3% +12% −12% +12.5% −12.5% Full HD +14% −14% +7.1% −7.1% +8% −8% +13.3% −13.3% +9.1% −9.1% +7.9% −7.9% +6% −6% +10.7% −10.7% +10.7% −10.7% +11.1% −11.1% +16.7% −16.7% Full HD +10% −10% 1440p +11.1% −11.1% +14.3% −14.3% 1440p +12.5% −12.5% +8.3% −8.3% +11.1% −11.1% +11.1% −11.1% +11.1% −11.1% +7.9% −7.9% +13.3% −13.3% +9.1% −9.1% +10% −10% +9.1% −9.1% +10% −10% +9.3% −9.3% 1440p +10% −10% 4K +8.3% −8.3% +16.7% −16.7% +13.3% −13.3% +11.7% −11.7% +6.7% −6.7% +6.7% −6.7% 4K +14.3% −14.3% +25% −25% +7.1% −7.1% +50% −50% +7.1% −7.1% +20% −20% +11.1% −11.1% +14.3% −14.3% 4K +16.7% −16.7% This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and GTX 1060 3 GB compete in popular games: GTX 1650 SUPER has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption. Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 4.14700 votes Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5: 4.28666 votes Rate GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in the ranking 206 216 Place by popularity 56 26 Cost-effectiveness evaluation no data 22.50 Power efficiency 18.38 14.45 Architecture Turing (2018−2022) Pascal (2016−2021) GPU code name TU116 GP106 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 22 November 2019 (5 years ago) 18 August 2016 (8 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) no data $199 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 1152 Core clock speed 1530 MHz 1506 MHz Boost clock speed 1725 MHz 1708 MHz Number of transistors 6,600 million 4,400 million Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 120 Watt Texture fill rate 138.0 123.0 Floating-point processing power 4.416 TFLOPS 3.935 TFLOPS ROPs 32 48 TMUs 80 72 Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 229 mm 250 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5 Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 2002 MHz Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 192.2 GB/s Shared memory - - Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort HDMI + + Supported technologies
VR Ready + no data Multi Monitor + no data API compatibility
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1) Shader Model 6.5 6.4 OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 1.2 1.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 + CUDA 7.5 6.1 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
Gaming performance
Average FPS across all PC games
Full HD 71 65−70 1440p 37 30−35 4K 22 18−21 Cost per frame, $
1080p no data 3.06 1440p no data 6.63 4K no data 11.06 FPS performance in popular games
Low PresetCyberpunk 2077 63 55−60
Medium PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 50−55 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53 50−55 Battlefield 5 85−90 80−85 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 50−55 Cyberpunk 2077 50 45−50 Far Cry 5 60−65 55−60 Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 60−65 Forza Horizon 4 150−160 140−150 Hitman 3 62 55−60 Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 110−120 Metro Exodus 69 65−70 Red Dead Redemption 2 84 75−80 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95 80−85 Watch Dogs: Legion 180 160−170
High PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 50−55 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26 24−27 Battlefield 5 85−90 80−85 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 50−55 Cyberpunk 2077 40 35−40 Far Cry 5 60−65 55−60 Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 60−65 Forza Horizon 4 150−160 140−150 Hitman 3 59 55−60 Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 110−120 Metro Exodus 82 75−80 Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 60−65 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101 95−100 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 50−55 Watch Dogs: Legion 180 160−170
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 50−55 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15 14−16 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 50−55 Cyberpunk 2077 34 30−33 Far Cry 5 60−65 55−60 Forza Horizon 4 150−160 140−150 Hitman 3 53 50−55 Horizon Zero Dawn 83 75−80 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83 75−80 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50 45−50 Watch Dogs: Legion 21 18−20
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 66 60−65
High PresetBattlefield 5 50−55 45−50 Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 35−40
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 24−27 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13 12−14 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33 27−30 Cyberpunk 2077 20 18−20 Far Cry 5 30−33 27−30 Forza Horizon 4 150−160 140−150 Hitman 3 34 30−33 Horizon Zero Dawn 60 55−60 Metro Exodus 55 50−55 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60 55−60 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 30−33 Watch Dogs: Legion 164 150−160
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 44 40−45
High PresetBattlefield 5 24−27 24−27 Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 18−20 Hitman 3 34 30−33 Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 120−130 Metro Exodus 32 30−33 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32 30−33
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 14−16 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5 4−5 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 14−16 Cyberpunk 2077 3 2−3 Far Cry 5 14−16 14−16 Forza Horizon 4 35−40 30−33 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30 27−30 Watch Dogs: Legion 8 7−8
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 21 18−20 Pros & cons summary
Performance score 26.34 24.85 Recency 22 November 2019 18 August 2016 Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 120 Watt Vote for your favorite
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
Questions & comments
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsGeForce GTX1060 6 GB
GeForce GTX1060 3 GB vsRadeon R9FURY X
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsGeForce RTX3050 6 GB
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsRadeon R7260X
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsRadeon HD7850
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsRadeon HD7750
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsRadeon HD7950
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsRadeon HD6570
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsGeForce GTX750 v2
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsGeForce GT720
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsGeForce GT710
GeForce GTX1650 SUPER vsGeForce GT730